Hi Bruce.
Can you briefly explain to me the concept of 'consistency' in aspice?
On the internet I have seen 'aspice consistency, as just being careful to use the same terminology across all SDLC levels, e.g., yoiu use the term 'component' to mean the same at all SDLC levels.
But elsewhere I have been told that 'aspice consistency' means that when a specific requirement is planned to be implemented by a specific architecture/design element, it actually is implemented by that design element--- and not instead implemented by some other design element than the one intended.
Thanks
Avi
My understanding is the it is the consistent use of terminology in different development phases. This is important because of the traceability requirements in ASPICE and if you need to make sense of trace links, you need to use terminology in the same way across the traced elements.